Home » An Idea of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management

An Idea of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management

Tuhin Mandal

Support Engineer,
Digital Care Pvt. Ltd, India
Email: mandaltuhin123@gmail.com


The learning process for entrepreneurship is all part of improving creative mind and ongoing education. The current financial environment is a unstable and aggressive one. This new business environment demands transformed enthusiasm of approach. Imagination and innovation about any product or business is the new name of the game. Only the perceptive business organizations can manage the intrinsic changes in the surroundings. Growth and development cannot be continued without any new innovations, with additional modification, firms become thrilling. This paper tries to establish this connection with innovation and corporate entrepreneurship. The reviews many works of literature on entrepreneurship and groups these previous studies in some basic themes related to entrepreneurship.


Project plan;
Risk management;
Resource finding.

download pdf

Cited as

Tuhin Mandal,  “An Idea of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management,”  International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management, Vol. 2, No. 10, pp. 235-239,  2017.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24999/IJOAEM/02100052


  1. Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3-22.
  2. Humphreys, S. C. (1969). History, economics, and anthropology: the work of Karl Polanyi. History and theory, 8(2), 165-212.
  3. Paulsen, N., Maldonado, D., Callan, V. J., & Ayoko, O. (2009). Charismatic leadership, change and innovation in an R&D organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(5), 511-523.
  4. Maurines, L. (2015). The Nature of Science in the French high school science syllabuses, role of the History of Science and innovative pedagogical proposals. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 9(1), 19-46.
  5. Harrison, S., & Sullivan Sr, P. H. (2000). Profiting from intellectual capital: learning from leading companies. Journal of intellectual capital, 1(1), 33-46.
  6. Fayolle, A., Basso, O., & Bouchard, V. (2010). Three levels of culture and firms’ entrepreneurial orientation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(7-8), 707-730.
  7. Romiszowski, A. J. (2004). How’s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY-SADDLE BROOK THEN ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS NJ-, 44(1), 5-27.
  8. Davenport, T. H., Harris, J. G., & Kohli, A. K. (2001). How do they know their customers so well?. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 63.
  9. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
  10. Parker, S. (2010). The great crash: How the stock market crash of 1929 plunged the world into depression. Hachette UK.
  11. Fojt, M. (1995). Strategies for service quality. Journal of Services Marketing, 9(3), 1-72.
  12. Garvin, D. A. (1985). Building a learning organization. Org Dev & Trng, 6E (Iae), 274.
  13. Schoeffler, S., Buzzell, R. D., & Heany, D. F. (1974). Impact of strategic planning on profit performance. Harvard Business Review, 52(2).
  14. Hirsch, P. M. (1997). Review essay: Sociology without social structure: Neoinstitutional theory meets brave new world. American journal of sociology, 102(6), 1702-1723.
  15. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business venturing, 18(1), 105-123.
  16. Balachandra, R., & Friar, J. H. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering management, 44(3), 276-287.
  17. Lucas Jr, R. E. (1993). Making a miracle. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 251-272.
  18. Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). The strategies for taking charge. Leaders, New York: Harper. Row.
  19. Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J., & Phillips, J. R. (1980). Structure is not organization. Business horizons, 23(3), 14-26.
  20. Mavhunga, C. C. (2008). The mobile workshop:Mobility, technology, and human-animal interaction in Gonarezhou (National Park), 1850–present (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan).
  21. Santos, B. D. S. (2002). The processes of globalisation. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais and Eurozine, 1-48.
  22. Wharton, I. (2013). Spark for the Fire: How youthful thinking unlocks creativity. Harriman House Limited.
  23. Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing myopia. Harvard business review, 38(4), 24-47.
  24. Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of management review, 25(2), 312-334.
  25. Marx, M., & Hsu, D. H. (2015). Strategic switchbacks: Dynamic commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 44(10), 1815-1826.
  26. Robinson, P. B., Stimpson, D. V., Huefner, J. C., & Hunt, H. K. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 15(4), 13-31.steakhouse-1
%d bloggers like this: