Home » Innovation and System Design

Innovation and System Design


Momin Mukherjee


e-mail: ijoaem@gmail.com


Analysis the solution or planning, meeting with the employees, clients, consultants how the product would be better than the competitors. After studying the information we have the choose one of these three option: how can develop the system, how can improve the current system or if any of these two are not possible than leave the system. Planning stage is the preliminary step for a successful system, at first we have to detect the problems how we solve it and what we want to do, the objectives and the resources, required cost etc. System design is the second step in the system. Here a feasibility study is needed to recognize the requirements of the end user’s i.e. customers, what are the expectations of them for the system. It is very vital to maintain a strong communication with the customers. Ensure that the finished product can fulfil its required level and its function. Design phases arise after the good understanding with the customer; it defines the elements of a system, the security level and the different types of data which are necessary for the system. A general system design may be complete with pen-paper work. After the designing phase the system required an implementation process. In the phases the system fulfil the customer promises, now the system is ready to running, training may be required or not. This phase may be takes a long time, that’s depends on the complexity of the system.


Entrepreneurship; Fact finding techniques; Innovation; System analysis; System design.

pdf-1Download PDF

Cited as

M.Mukherjee, “Innovation and System Design,” International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 29-32, 2017. https://ijoaem.org/00202-1

 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24999/IJOAEM/02020011


  1. F. Milano, “An Open Source Power System Analysis Toolbox,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1199-1206, Aug 2005.
  2. R. Sanchez and J. T. Mahoney, “Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product andOrganization Design,” Strategic Management Journal , vol. 17, no. S2, pp. 63-76, 1996.
  3. F. James and M. Roos, “Minuit – a System for Function Minimization and Analysis of the Parameter Errors And Correlations,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 343–367, Decembe 1975.
  4. R. E. Kalman and J. E. Bertram, “Control System Analysis and Design Via the “Second Method” of Lyapunov: I—Continuous-Time Systems,” Journal of Basic Engineering, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 371-393, 01 Jun 1960.
  5. A. Ferreiraa and D. Otleyb, “The Design and use of Performance Management Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 263–282, Decembe 2009.
  6. G. Granelli, M. Montagna, F. Zanellini, P. Bresesti and R. Vailati, “A Genetic Algorithm-Based Procedure To Optimize System Topology Against Parallel Flows,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 333 – 340, Feb 2006.
  7. K. Mukherjee, “The Psychology of the Successful Entrepreneur,” International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25-32, 2016.
  8. M. Mukherjee, “Entrepreneurial Judgment and Analysis for Successful Strategy Implementation,” International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2017.
  9. M. Dorigo and L. Gambardella, “Ant Colony System: A Cooperative Learning Approach to The Traveling Salesman Problem,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53 – 66, Apr 1997.
  10. A. Bergeka, S. Jacobssonb, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark and A. Rickne, “Analyzing The Functional Dynamics Of Technological Innovation Systems: A scheme of Analysis,” Research Policy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 407–429, April 2008.
  11. C. Edquist, “Design of Innovation Policy Through Diagnostic Analysis: Identification of Systemic Problems (or Failures),” Industrial and Corporate Change vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1725-1753, Dcember 2011.
  12. R. Simons, “Accounting Control Systems and Business Strategy: An Empirical Analysis,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 357-374, 1987.
  13. T. Browning, “Applying The Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review And New Directions,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 292-306, Aug 2001.
  14. A. K. Chopra and R. K. Goel, “A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure for Estimating Seismic Demands for Buildings,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 561–582, 2002 .
  15. R. K. Woolthuisa, M. Lankhuizenb and V. Gilsingc, “A System Failure Framework for Innovation Policy Design,” Technovation, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 609–619, June 2005.


%d bloggers like this: